Skip to content

Country profiles › Italy

Country profile · selected regime

Italy — testing automated vehicles

MIT authorisation, an onboard supervisor and the evidence required for public-road trials.

Profile scope

The testing route under DM 70/2018, with a distinction from the Sperimentazione Italia experimentation programme. These materials do not establish a general licence for driverless commercial operation.

Selected sources checked:

Review limits ↓

The following answers are ROAT paraphrases and interpretations. Check the cited source for its exact wording and temporal applicability.

Who authorises testing?

Testing under the decree requires authorisation from the Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti (MIT), preceded by the relevant road manager's or owner's consent (nulla osta). Manufacturers, universities and public or private research bodies may apply.

Authorisation is tied to specified vehicles, systems, road sections and conditions. Article 9 addresses vehicles already approved in their version without automated technology and preserves the separate prototype-validation route under DPR 474/2001.

What is the supervisor's role?

The regime uses an onboard supervisor (supervisore). The supervisor must be able to take manual control in time, with their intervention overriding automated commands. The decree assigns the supervisor responsibility for circulation in both manual and automated modes.

Article 10 requires the appropriate driving licence held for at least five years, relevant training and documented experience. This is a supervised-testing profile, not general permission to operate with nobody on board.

What evidence must support the application?

The application describes the technology, vehicles, intended road sections, traffic and weather conditions, previous tests, scenarios and differences between simulation and real traffic. It includes risk analysis and safety measures, including cybersecurity.

MIT may request further evidence. A manufacturer's statement that a vehicle is technically capable of automated driving does not replace authorisation. The evidence must address the particular testing proposal.

What applies during testing?

The Highway Code and the individual authorisation conditions apply. The decree requires safe interaction with other road users, including vulnerable people, manual takeover and data recording. The holder must meet notification and reporting duties, including for safety-relevant events.

Authorisation lasts one year and may be renewed on application. Data must be retained during the authorisation and for a further 12 months. Safety risks may lead to suspension or revocation.

What insurance is required?

Article 19 requires specific civil-liability insurance for the automated vehicle under test. The minimum cover is four times the limit set by applicable rules for the same vehicle without automated technology. The contract must expressly record the insurer's awareness of automated operation on public roads. This does not itself resolve liability allocation for every accident.

How do the sandbox and appropriate-speed rules relate?

Sperimentazione Italia is a separate, project-specific and time-limited experimentation route. The 2022 official announcement concerning autonomous shuttles in Turin illustrates its use; it does not establish a present general licence for autonomous passenger transport.

Constitutional Court Order 218/2005 concerns a human driver and speed appropriate to the circumstances. ROAT uses it as interpretive context: compliance with a traffic duty can require more than observing a numeric limit. The order does not approve an ADS or any specific automated operation.

Sources and review scope

Decreto 28 febbraio 2018, n. 70 — Smart Road

Official text in GU No. 90 of 18 April 2018. The decree is dated 28 February 2018. Its exact original commencement date was not separately established; MIT continues to list this authorisation procedure.

Official source ↗ROAT library record · ROAT-2026-0445 →

Review limits

Targeted review of Articles 1 and 9–20 of the decree and current MIT information. This is not a complete audit of type approval, transport licences, liability or all possible derogations. The Turin project is a historical example; its present operating status is not confirmed here.

All country profiles →