Skip to content
ROAT — Regulation of Automated TransportROAT — Regulation of Automated Transport

Regulatory map › Great Britain

ROAT-JUR-UK · profil countries

Great Britain

Conditions for testing and operating automated vehicles, competent authorities and sources.

Download country profile (PDF, Slovak) ↓How to cite this profile ↓

Scenarios, comparisons and related material

Data coverage and review limits →

What changed? Country overview →

Selected sources checked: · Working research overview · targeted review of provisions

Scope: Testing with a driver + driverless pilot + APS

The transitional nature of the framework is retained. Driverless pilots, testing with a driver and passenger service permits are distinguished. Earlier guidance describing planned APS commencement is read against the adopted SI 2026/437 and 439. Individual VSOs, specific permits and full civil liability remain outside the review.

Roles in this country

The glossary explains each term’s tasks, legal status and sources.

What enables driverless operation?

A pilot without a safety driver combines vehicle approval and registration, a VSO for necessary exemptions and listing as an automated vehicle under the 2018 Act. A passenger service additionally requires an APS permit. The VCA issues the VSO on behalf of the Secretary of State; APS has a separate statutory basis.

APS alone does not establish that the vehicle may operate without a driver.

Who bears operational duties?

The trialling organisation ensures test safety. Pilot guidance separately considers the operator; the APS holder fulfils service conditions. One or several persons may perform these roles.

The relevant national authority has power to grant APS permits. SI 2026/439 governs the Secretary of State’s competence only within its material and territorial scope.

What safety evidence is needed?

For testing, the guidance expects an appropriate safety case. Pilot guidance requires a documented safety case, a safety management system and evidence of operator capability.

These are guidance and assessment requirements; legally binding restrictions for a specific journey must be read in the VSO and APS permit.

What is known about damage, insurance and offences?

Insurance remains a statutory condition of testing; compliance with guidance does not guarantee exemption from liability. Breaches of APS conditions or serious traffic and safety problems may lead to variation, suspension or withdrawal of the permit.

Full compensation arrangements for vehicles listed under the 2018 Act and criminal liability are not assessed in this overview.

What conditions and open issues remain?

The APS basis in sections 82–83 has been in force since 15 May 2026. SI 2026/439 provides a maximum five-year term; it applies to public service vehicle services throughout Great Britain and other APS in England.

The entire Automated Vehicles Act 2024 cannot be described as in force. Northern Ireland and separate rules for other services in Wales and Scotland are outside this overview.

Compare with another country

The same seven questions, with answers side by side.

Sources and review scope

DfT — Automated vehicle trialling code of practice

Guidance updated on 24 June 2026; Introduction, Legal requirements and Safety cases sections checked. Guidance must be distinguished from statutory duties.

Open official source ↗

DfT — Self-driving vehicle pilot scheme: information for applicants

Scope, VSO and vehicle listing, Monitoring and control and Tables 1–4 checked on 7 September 2026. The text also contains earlier planned dates; APS commencement was checked separately against SI 2026/437 and 439.

Open official source ↗

Automated Vehicles Act 2024, section 82

Revised text retrieved on 7 September 2026; section 82 in force since 15 May 2026.

Open official source ↗

Automated Vehicles Act 2024, section 83

Revised text retrieved on 7 September 2026; in force since 15 May 2026. Effect of the permit on taxi, private hire and bus regulation.

Open official source ↗

SI 2026/439 — Permits for Automated Passenger Services

Official adopted text; commencement on 15 May 2026. Regulation 1(3) limits material and territorial scope; regulations 3 and 5–8 govern duration and interventions affecting permits.

Open official source ↗

SI 2026/437 — Commencement No. 2

Official text; regulation 2 provides commencement from 15 May 2026 and exceptions in Part 5. This instrument did not bring the full authorisation architecture into force.

Open official source ↗

Related ROAT records: ROAT-2026-0171

How to cite this profile

ROAT. Great Britain — country profile. ROAT Observatory. Working research overview; targeted source review on 7 September 2026. https://roat.sk/en/jurisdictions/great-britain/.

Add the access date. Web profiles may change; save the PDF as well to preserve the material used. When making a claim about the law, cite the legislation and provision identified in the answer.

The practical answers use the same evidence as the country comparison. Earlier research material with its own dates is retained below.

Earlier research material and ROAT records

Jurisdictions › Great Britain

ROAT-JUR-UK

Great Britain

Last verified 2026-09-05 (JA)Authorities Secretary of State for Transport · DVSA · Local transport authorities (APS consent)

Great Britain is the control case in which dedicated responsible actors and an authorisation architecture were legislated before routine general deployment. The 2026 Automated Passenger Services permit is a targeted early route; the full authorisation framework and the statement of safety principles are still being implemented.

Automated Vehicles Act 2024 with phased commencement; Automated Passenger Services permits (SI 2026/439) in 2026; full framework planned for 2027.

In Module 01 · snapshot 2026-08-25 review snapshot

Regulatory normalisation by functional layer

RegimeTechnical approvalRoad access / operationActor allocationLiability / riskBehavioural rulesInfrastructureInternational / cross-borderRange · asynchronyConfiguration family
Great BritainAPS permit bridge before full 2027 AV Act implementationN3N2N3N3N2N1N22 · SignificantActor / institutional-leading configuration with staged operational permitting

Great Britain Actor / institutional-leading configuration with staged operational permitting

Technical approval
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Road access / operation
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Actor allocation
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Liability / risk
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Behavioural rules
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Infrastructure
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
International / cross-border
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Primary current-law rationale
The 2024 Act creates dedicated responsible actors and authorisation architecture; 2026 APS permits enable passenger-service deployment while the full authorisation framework and final safety principles are still being implemented.
Dominant legal bridge / gate
APS permit bridge before full 2027 AV Act implementation
Sensitivity range
Operation N2–N3; actor/liability N2–N3; international N1–N2.
Robust conclusion
Actor/institution-leading configuration survives plausible recoding; legal institutionalisation precedes routine general deployment.
Important caveat
General full-Act implementation is planned for 2027; APS is a targeted early route, not proof that all AV use is N3.
Confidence
High
N0Unintegrated / exceptional
N1Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
N2Bridge-based integration
N3Dedicated institutionalisation
N4Routinisation / mainstream recognition

In Module 02 · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Post-type-approval deployment models

RegimeDeployment gateRemote human roleDominant deployment modelLegal statusConfidence
Great Britain – 2026 transitional current lawAutomated Passenger Service permit under Part 5 of the AV Act 2024 (in force 15 May 2026) for eligible passenger services; other deployments run as pilots under vehicle special orders; Part 1 authorisation not yet commenced at snapshotNo German-style technical supervisor as universal core role; remote functions depend on operating modelStaged-permit model (APS permits and pilots ahead of Part 1 authorisation)Partly in force: Part 5 (APS permits) from 15 May 2026; Part 1 authorisation and Part 4 marketing restrictions commence in 2027High

Great Britain – 2026 transitional current law

Regulatory object
APS permit holder and pilot-operator architecture as the 2026 transitional route; authorised self-driving vehicle / responsible-entity architecture enacted but not yet commenced
Technical approval baseline
UK vehicle approval/self-driving authorisation architecture under AV Act implementation programme
Additional deployment / road-use gate
Automated Passenger Service permit under Part 5 of the AV Act 2024 (in force 15 May 2026) for eligible passenger services; other deployments run as pilots under vehicle special orders; Part 1 authorisation not yet commenced at snapshot
ODD / operating-area legalisation
Deployment area fixed through APS permit and pilot conditions; authorised domain under Part 1 of the AV Act not yet in force
Competent authority / decision maker
Secretary of State / DVSA and relevant local transport authority for APS consent
Primary accountable organisational actor
APS permit holder / pilot operator; ASDE and NUiC-operator architecture in Part 1 of the AV Act not yet in force
Remote human role
No German-style technical supervisor as universal core role; remote functions depend on operating model
DDT / fallback allocation
Authorised ADS performs self-driving task; user-in-charge duties are separated where relevant
Traffic-offence allocation
No general rule in force at snapshot: Part 1 reallocation of legal responsibility away from the user not yet commenced; pilot and permit conditions require reporting of infractions
Civil liability / insurance
Dedicated: Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 s. 2 makes the insurer liable for accidents caused by a listed automated vehicle driving itself; AV Act 2024 insurance and liability provisions pending
Data / logging
Reporting under APS permit conditions and pilot conditions (collisions, infractions); information duties of Part 1 of the AV Act not yet in force
Post-market / in-use oversight
Oversight through APS permit monitoring and pilot conditions; in-use regulation under Part 1 planned for full implementation
Material change / software update
APS Regulations 2026 treat a material change in circumstances as a ground for permit variation, suspension or withdrawal; AV Act ss 5, 8 and 9 authorisation powers not yet commenced
Retesting / revalidation
Permit-level: variation, suspension or withdrawal of an APS permit or pilot on breach or incident; general authorisation lifecycle under Part 1 remains implementation-stage through 2027
Commercial service pathway
APS permit enables staged commercial passenger deployment in 2026
Dominant deployment model
Staged-permit model (APS permits and pilots ahead of Part 1 authorisation)
Legal status
Partly in force: Part 5 (APS permits) from 15 May 2026; Part 1 authorisation and Part 4 marketing restrictions commence in 2027
Primary-source anchor
Automated Vehicles Act 2024 and Commencement No. 1–3 Regulations (SI 2025/1339, 2026/437, 2026/731); SI 2026/439; AEVA 2018 s. 2; DfT implementation programme
Primary current-law rationale
UK is a control case showing that actor/institution design can legally precede full ordinary deployment.
Confidence
High

Sources

Public Library records for Great Britain

The Automated Vehicles (Permits for Automated Passenger Services) Regulations 2026
Automated Vehicles Act implementation programme
Automated vehicles: statement of safety principles consultation