Skip to content
ROAT — Regulation of Automated TransportROAT — Regulation of Automated Transport

MethodConcepts › Dynamic driving task (DDT)

ROAT-CON-DDT · concept

Dynamic driving task (DDT)

Also: DDT · Fahraufgabe · dynamická úloha riadenia

All real-time operational and tactical functions required to operate a vehicle in on-road traffic: lateral and longitudinal motion control, object and event detection and response, and manoeuvre planning. Strategic functions such as trip scheduling and the choice of destination are not part of it. In the Observatory the question of who performs the DDT separates the automated driving system from every human role: a role that supervises, assists, intervenes or dispatches does not perform the DDT.

Locus in the sources

SAE J3016_202104 – Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles — § 3.10
Canonical definition; § 3.14 and § 3.15 define the two motion-control subtasks.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426 on type-approval of automated driving systems — Art. 2(25)
The remote intervention operator shall not drive; the ADS continues to perform the DDT.
Interpretation of remote intervention and remote interaction (ADS-21-71/Rev.3) — Revised text
Remote interaction and intervention support tactical functions while the ADS performs the entire DDT.

Related concepts

DDT fallback and minimal risk condition · Remote driving

In Module 03 · column “DDT” · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Human roles in automated driving

RoleDDT
Human driver
UNECE / 1968 Vienna Convention
Yes
ADS as functional substitute for driver requirement
UNECE / 1968 Vienna Convention
System
Remote assistance / remote interaction
UNECE ADS work / technical interpretation
No
Transport / service operator
European Union – Regulation (EU) 2022/1426
No
Remote management function
European Union – Regulation (EU) 2022/1426 / JRC interpretation
No
Authorised self-driving entity / ADS legal-responsibility entity
Great Britain – Automated Vehicles Act 2024
No
User with limited in-vehicle legal duties during self-driving
Great Britain – Automated Vehicles Act 2024
No while engaged
No-user-in-charge operational entity
Great Britain – Automated Vehicles Act 2024
No
Technical remote supervisor
Germany – StVG / AFGBV
No continuous
Automated road transport system operator
France – STRA framework
No
Authorised remote intervention person
France – STRA / automated-driving framework
No – intervention …
In-vehicle operator during automated operation
Croatia – Road Traffic Safety Act
No
Remote intervention operator
Croatia – Road Traffic Safety Act
No
Licensed fully automated vehicle operator
Slovakia – parliamentary print 1329 (draft)
No
Supervision operator
Slovakia – parliamentary print 1329 (draft)
No continuous
Level 3 fallback-ready user
SAE J3016
After takeover
Remote human driver
SAE J3016
Yes
Trip-dispatch / strategic user
SAE J3016
No
Prototype ADS fallback test driver
SAE J3018
Conditional
In-vehicle prototype fallback test driver
SAE J3018
After takeover
Remote prototype fallback test driver
SAE J3018
Possible during fa…
Safety driver in public-road AV testing
California – DMV testing regime
Conditional
AV testing permit holder
California – DMV AV program
No
Automated-vehicle trial permit holder
Sweden – Swedish Transport Agency
No
ADS lifecycle safety entity
Australia – proposed Automated Vehicle Safety Law framework
No
Driverless-operation permission holder
Japan – Road Traffic Act SAO framework
No
Remote operational supervisor
Japan – Road Traffic Act SAO framework
No
Automated commercial vehicle pilot participant
Ontario, Canada – ACMV Pilot Program
No
Driverless-test oversight assistant
Ontario, Canada – ACMV Pilot Program
No regular
Vehicle owner as statutory responsibility holder
Croatia – Road Traffic Safety Act
No
yesYes — the role performs this functionnoNo — it does notsysSystem — performed by the ADS, not a personQualified — the cell states the conditionNot codedYes …An outlined chip is a qualified answer: read the cell text, not the colour.

In Module 02 · column “DDT / fallback allocation” · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Post-type-approval deployment models

RegimeDDT / fallback allocation
Germany – current lawADS performs DDT; system must comply with road rules and achieve minimum-risk condition where necessary
France – current lawADS performs DDT; remote intervention supports defined situations without collapsing into ordinary remote driving
Croatia – current lawADS performs driverless operation; remote intervention supports defined operational/safety functions
Great Britain – 2026 transitional current lawAuthorised ADS performs self-driving task; user-in-charge duties are separated where relevant
China – current transitional regimeL3 ADS performs DDT within approved conditions; human fallback remains relevant to L3 design
China – 2026 Road Traffic Safety Law draft prospectiveADS continuously performs full DDT within design operating conditions; L2 assistance is expressly distinguished
Slovakia – current law (31 Aug 2026)Current framework remains structurally driver/test oriented; dedicated driverless DDT allocation is incomplete
Slovakia – CPT 1329 prospective model prospectiveADS should remain DDT performer; current wording risks transferring DDT remotely to supervisor in some clauses

Cite this concept

ROAT Observatory, concept Dynamic driving task (DDT) [ROAT-CON-DDT], approved definition, 2026-09-07. Jozef Andraško. /method/concepts/dynamic-driving-task/