Skip to content
ROAT — Regulation of Automated TransportROAT — Regulation of Automated Transport

MethodConcepts › Remote driving

ROAT-CON-REMOTE-DRIVING · concept

Remote driving

Also: remote driver · teleoperated driving · Fernsteuerung · diaľkové riadenie

Real-time performance of part or all of the DDT or the DDT fallback, including braking, steering and acceleration, by a remote driver who completes the object and event detection and response and may overrule the automated driving system. EU type-approval law leaves it outside the ADS framework; German law confines the technical supervision to releasing manoeuvres and, after a defect, to near-field manual control at walking speed within six metres. The Observatory codes remote driving as its own column so that a supervisor or intervention role is never mistaken for a remote driver.

Locus in the sources

SAE J3016_202104 – Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles — § 3.24, § 3.31.1.2
Remote driving and the remote driver.
Interpretation of EU Regulation 2022/1426 on the Type Approval of Automated Driving Systems: Addendum for Safety Management System and Remote Management — Appendix 2, § 2.2.3
Remote driving outside the scope of Regulation (EU) 2022/1426.
Ordinance on the approval and operation of motor vehicles with autonomous driving function in defined operating areas, AFGBV (Verordnung zur Genehmigung und zum Betrieb von Kraftfahrzeugen mit autonomer Fahrfunktion in festgelegten Betriebsbereichen) — § 14(3), Anlage 1 Nr. 4
Near-field remote control at walking speed, six metres.
Technical Report of the Working Group “Research Needs in Teleoperation” (BASt F 166b) — Ch. 2
Distinction between remote assistance and direct remote control.

Related concepts

Dynamic driving task (DDT) · Remote intervention

In Module 03 · column “Remote driving” · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Human roles in automated driving

RoleRemote driving
Human driver
UNECE / 1968 Vienna Convention
No
ADS as functional substitute for driver requirement
UNECE / 1968 Vienna Convention
No human remote dr…
Remote assistance / remote interaction
UNECE ADS work / technical interpretation
No
Transport / service operator
European Union – Regulation (EU) 2022/1426
No
Remote management function
European Union – Regulation (EU) 2022/1426 / JRC interpretation
No – outside Regul…
Authorised self-driving entity / ADS legal-responsibility entity
Great Britain – Automated Vehicles Act 2024
No
User with limited in-vehicle legal duties during self-driving
Great Britain – Automated Vehicles Act 2024
No
No-user-in-charge operational entity
Great Britain – Automated Vehicles Act 2024
No
Technical remote supervisor
Germany – StVG / AFGBV
Near-field takeove…
Automated road transport system operator
France – STRA framework
No
Authorised remote intervention person
France – STRA / automated-driving framework
Not ordinary
In-vehicle operator during automated operation
Croatia – Road Traffic Safety Act
No
Remote intervention operator
Croatia – Road Traffic Safety Act
No
Licensed fully automated vehicle operator
Slovakia – parliamentary print 1329 (draft)
Arranged if remote…
Supervision operator
Slovakia – parliamentary print 1329 (draft)
Potential boundary
Level 3 fallback-ready user
SAE J3016
No
Remote human driver
SAE J3016
Yes
Trip-dispatch / strategic user
SAE J3016
No
Prototype ADS fallback test driver
SAE J3018
Possible
In-vehicle prototype fallback test driver
SAE J3018
No
Remote prototype fallback test driver
SAE J3018
Potentially yes
Safety driver in public-road AV testing
California – DMV testing regime
No
AV testing permit holder
California – DMV AV program
No
Automated-vehicle trial permit holder
Sweden – Swedish Transport Agency
Possible by permit…
ADS lifecycle safety entity
Australia – proposed Automated Vehicle Safety Law framework
No
Driverless-operation permission holder
Japan – Road Traffic Act SAO framework
No
Remote operational supervisor
Japan – Road Traffic Act SAO framework
No routine
Automated commercial vehicle pilot participant
Ontario, Canada – ACMV Pilot Program
No
Driverless-test oversight assistant
Ontario, Canada – ACMV Pilot Program
No regular driving
Vehicle owner as statutory responsibility holder
Croatia – Road Traffic Safety Act
No
yesYes — the role performs this functionnoNo — it does notsysSystem — performed by the ADS, not a personQualified — the cell states the conditionNot codedYes …An outlined chip is a qualified answer: read the cell text, not the colour.

In Module 02 · column “Remote human role” · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Post-type-approval deployment models

RegimeRemote human role
Germany – current lawTechnische Aufsicht – may deactivate and release specified manoeuvres; not ordinary continuous remote driving
France – current lawQualified remote intervention personnel integrated into system operation
Croatia – current lawRemote intervention role recognised; boundaries and concurrency remain implementation questions
Great Britain – 2026 transitional current lawNo German-style technical supervisor as universal core role; remote functions depend on operating model
China – current transitional regimeNo mature national standalone technical-supervisor/remote-operator role architecture yet
China – 2026 Road Traffic Safety Law draft prospectiveRemote human role remains underdeveloped in the draft
Slovakia – current law (31 Aug 2026)No general commercial FAV technical-supervision/control-centre role in force; supervising driver (dohliadajúci vodič) with remote takeover for automated delivery vehicles (Act 8/2009 § 2(2)(w), § 5(6))
Slovakia – CPT 1329 prospective model prospectiveSupervision operator + control centre; current draft boundary with remote driving needs correction

Cite this concept

ROAT Observatory, concept Remote driving [ROAT-CON-REMOTE-DRIVING], approved definition, 2026-09-07. Jozef Andraško. /method/concepts/remote-driving/