Skip to content
ROAT — Regulation of Automated TransportROAT — Regulation of Automated Transport

Regulatory map › France

ROAT-JUR-FR · profil countries

France

Conditions for testing and operating automated vehicles, competent authorities and sources.

Download country profile (PDF, Slovak) ↓How to cite this profile ↓

Scenarios, comparisons and related material

Data coverage and review limits →

What changed? Country overview →

Selected sources checked: · Working research overview · targeted review of provisions

Scope: Testing + automated passenger transport system

The testing regime was checked in the consolidated text as of 7 September 2026, including the 2020 amendment. The operational branch is limited to passenger transport. The current text of R3152-3 was confirmed directly on Légifrance. This review concerns specific provisions; freight transport, full civil liability and all implementing requirements remain outside its scope.

Roles in this country

The glossary explains each term’s tasks, legal status and sources.

Who authorises test drives?

Permission is issued by the minister responsible for transport following an opinion from the interior minister and, where appropriate, other relevant authorities. It specifies roads, functions and routes; it lasts no more than two years and can be renewed once.

What enables driverless operation?

For an automated passenger transport system, the service organiser takes the commissioning decision. This is based on safety dossiers and favourable expert opinions, which may contain conditions. Before launch, the decision is notified to the prefect, the designated authority and road managers.

Who bears operational duties?

The organiser is responsible for preparing safety dossiers and the launch decision. The operator establishes an operational safety management system. During testing, the permit holder ensures remedial action for events threatening safety.

What is known about damage, insurance and offences?

The testing regime allocates liability for offences between the driver and permit holder depending on the system’s state; the holder’s criminal liability for specified consequences requires proven fault. Separate Article L123-2 addresses the manufacturer or its representative during automated driving under statutory conditions.

These rules must not be reduced to “the manufacturer is liable for everything”. Compensation, insurance and transport-system-specific rules require separate assessment.

What conditions and open issues remain?

The practical operational branch covers passenger transport. A new or substantially modified system requires a decision under R3152-11. If expert opinion conditions are not met within the specified period, the service cannot operate.

Freight transport and full sector-specific authorisations were not re-verified in this pilot.

Compare with another country

The same seven questions, with answers side by side.

Sources and review scope

Ordonnance n° 2016-1057 — experimental driving

Consolidated text as of 7 September 2026 checked directly on Légifrance; Articles 1, 2, 2-1 and 2-2. Text information last updated on 24 May 2019.

Open official source ↗

Décret n° 2018-211 — testing conditions

Consolidated text as of 7 September 2026 checked directly on Légifrance, including the 2020 amendments; Articles 2–5, 10–12 and 15.

Open official source ↗

Code des transports R3152-11 — commissioning decision

Current article page retrieved on 7 September 2026; it identifies the version in force from 1 September 2022.

Open official source ↗

Code des transports R3152-3 — person performing remote intervention

Current text as of 7 September 2026 checked directly on Légifrance; article in force since 1 September 2022. Training and medical fitness of the person performing remote intervention were checked.

Open official source ↗

Code des transports R3152-8 — safety dossier

Current article page retrieved on 7 September 2026; it identifies the version in force from 1 September 2022.

Open official source ↗

Code de la route L123-2 — criminal liability and fines

Current article page retrieved on 7 September 2026; text in force from 11 July 2025, including Act 2025-622.

Open official source ↗

Related ROAT records: ROAT-2026-0307 · ROAT-2026-0308 · ROAT-2026-0176

How to cite this profile

ROAT. France — country profile. ROAT Observatory. Working research overview; targeted source review on 7 September 2026. https://roat.sk/en/jurisdictions/france/.

Add the access date. Web profiles may change; save the PDF as well to preserve the material used. When making a claim about the law, cite the legislation and provision identified in the answer.

The practical answers use the same evidence as the country comparison. Earlier research material with its own dates is retained below.

Earlier research material and ROAT records

Jurisdictions › France

ROAT-JUR-FR

France

Last verified 2026-09-05 (JA)Authorities Service organiser · Competent transport and road authorities

France regulates the socio-technical automated road transport system — vehicle, technical system, route or zone and service organisation — rather than the vehicle alone. Technical approval is necessary but not sufficient: a prior safety demonstration, qualified independent opinions and a formal mise-en-service decision by the organiser stand between approval and operation.

Ordonnance 2021-443, Décret 2021-873, Code des transports R3151/R3152; freight extension by Décret 2024-1063.

In Module 01 · snapshot 2026-08-25 review snapshot

Regulatory normalisation by functional layer

RegimeTechnical approvalRoad access / operationActor allocationLiability / riskBehavioural rulesInfrastructureInternational / cross-borderRange · asynchronyConfiguration family
FrancePrior safety demonstration + qualified-body opinions + organiser decision of mise en serviceN3N3N3N2N3N2N21 · MildDeployment-assurance configuration – system safety-case / organiser-decision variant

France Deployment-assurance configuration – system safety-case / organiser-decision variant

Technical approval
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Road access / operation
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Actor allocation
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Liability / risk
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Behavioural rules
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Infrastructure
N2 — Bridge-based integration
International / cross-border
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Primary current-law rationale
France combines EU vehicle approval with a dedicated automated-road-transport-system regime requiring safety demonstration for the technical system and deployed route or zone, qualified independent assessment, remote-intervention qualifications, safety management and a formal service-organiser decision before operation.
Dominant legal bridge / gate
Prior safety demonstration + qualified-body opinions + organiser decision of mise en service
Sensitivity range
Liability N2-N3; infrastructure N1-N2; international N2-N3.
Robust conclusion
Deployment-assurance configuration remains robust, with a safety-case/organiser-decision gate rather than Croatia’s service-test gate.
Important caveat
Dedicated criminal responsibility is clear; civil-liability allocation is less comprehensively AV-specific and is therefore coded conservatively at N2.
Confidence
High
N0Unintegrated / exceptional
N1Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
N2Bridge-based integration
N3Dedicated institutionalisation
N4Routinisation / mainstream recognition

In Module 02 · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Post-type-approval deployment models

RegimeDeployment gateRemote human roleDominant deployment modelLegal statusConfidence
France – current lawPrior system safety demonstration + qualified independent opinions + formal mise-en-service decisionQualified remote intervention personnel integrated into system operationSystem/service safety-assurance modelIn forceHigh

France – current law

Regulatory object
Automated road transport system: vehicle + technical system + route/zone + service organisation
Technical approval baseline
EU type approval / relevant vehicle technical approval
Additional deployment / road-use gate
Prior system safety demonstration + qualified independent opinions + formal mise-en-service decision
ODD / operating-area legalisation
Safety case is tied to intended route or zone and service configuration
Competent authority / decision maker
Service organiser / competent transport and road authorities within statutory framework
Primary accountable organisational actor
Automated transport-system/service operator architecture rather than vehicle owner alone
Remote human role
Qualified remote intervention personnel integrated into system operation
DDT / fallback allocation
ADS performs DDT; remote intervention supports defined situations without collapsing into ordinary remote driving
Traffic-offence allocation
Dedicated criminal-responsibility adaptations exist; detailed allocation depends on operating mode and legal actor
Civil liability / insurance
Compulsory insurance/general civil-liability rules supplemented by dedicated automated-driving responsibility provisions; civil layer less comprehensive than deployment layer
Data / logging
System/event recording and safety-management evidence required
Post-market / in-use oversight
In-use system safety management and authority oversight tied to service operation
Material change / software update
Code des transports R3151-1 defines a substantial modification as one that changes the safety assessment; R3152-18 requires notification and, for a substantially modified system, suspension of operation.
Retesting / revalidation
Explicit re-commissioning: after a substantial modification the organiser suspends operation and a new mise-en-service decision is taken under R3152-10 to R3152-12; R3152-11 applies to new or substantially modified systems.
Commercial service pathway
Yes. Passenger automated-road-transport-system pathway extended to automated road freight by Décret 2024-1063, effective 28 Nov 2024.
Dominant deployment model
System/service safety-assurance model
Legal status
In force
Primary-source anchor
Ordonnance 2021-443; Décret 2021-873; Code des transports R3151/R3152; Décret 2024-1063 / R3251–R3253
Primary current-law rationale
France regulates the socio-technical transport system, not merely the vehicle. Technical approval is necessary but not sufficient for service deployment.
Confidence
High

Sources

Public Library records for France

Decree No. 2021-873 of 29 June 2021 implementing Ordonnance No. 2021-443 (Décret n° 2021-873)
Decree No. 2024-1063 of 25 November 2024 on automated road freight transport (Décret n° 2024-1063 relatif au transport routier automatisé de marchandises)
French Road Code – Chapter 9: Provisions applicable to vehicles with delegated driving (Code de la route, articles L319-1 to L319-4)
Ordonnance No. 2021-443 of 14 April 2021 on criminal liability and conditions of use for vehicles with delegated driving (Ordonnance n° 2021-443)
France — Code des transports, article R3151-1: automated passenger transport
France — Code des transports, article R3251-2: automated freight transport