Skip to content
ROAT — Regulation of Automated TransportROAT — Regulation of Automated Transport

Regulatory map › Slovakia

ROAT-JUR-SK · profil countries

Slovakia

Conditions for testing and operating automated vehicles, competent authorities and sources.

Download country profile (PDF, Slovak) ↓How to cite this profile ↓

Scenarios, comparisons and related material

Data coverage and review limits →

Explain legal roles in the glossary →

Practical scenario: test drive with a driver →

What changed? Country overview →

Selected sources checked: · Working research overview · targeted review of provisions

Scope: Testing route + specific delivery vehicles

The reference to § 49 has been updated following the amendment effective from 1 September 2026. The finding that a general route is absent is limited to the provisions checked and the status of parliamentary bill 1329. The guide does not cover the entire implementing legislation, all road traffic rules or individual permits.

Roles in this country

The glossary explains each term’s tasks, legal status and sources.

Who authorises test drives?

The Ministry of Transport, as type-approval authority, grants permission under § 49. For unapproved automated vehicles, the manufacturer or its representative applies; since 1 September 2026 this falls under paragraph 1(c).

What enables driverless operation?

§ 49 authorises testing. § 52 provides a specific route for automated delivery vehicles. No general licence for ordinary driverless services was identified in the provisions checked.

Parliamentary bill 1329 remains a proposal. This finding alone does not determine the permissibility of every particular project.

Who bears operational duties?

The applicant ensures the technical, staffing and organisational prerequisites. The permit holder is responsible for fulfilling operational duties and testing conditions.

What is the human role?

§ 49 envisages a driver to whom the permit holder provides the permit. The precise supervision arrangements for a particular driverless test require consideration of road traffic rules and permit conditions.

The role of remote supervision is not fully verified in this overview.

What safety evidence is needed?

Testing safety is demonstrated through information about off-road testing or trials abroad.

What is known about damage, insurance and offences?

The holder ensures liability insurance where required by separate legislation.

The full allocation of compensation and liability for offences requires a separate review.

Compare with another country

The same seven questions, with answers side by side.

Sources and review scope

Act No. 106/2018 Coll. on vehicle operation

Version applicable 1–30 September 2026; review of § 49, § 52 and designation of the authority in § 135(2). The Act also has a further version from 1 October 2026.

Open official source ↗

National Council of the Slovak Republic — parliamentary bill 1329

Legislative status checked on 7 September 2026: committee stage; committee deadlines of 11 and 14 September 2026.

Open official source ↗

Related ROAT records: ROAT-2026-0156 · ROAT-2026-0159 · ROAT-2026-0306

How to cite this profile

ROAT. Slovakia — country profile. ROAT Observatory. Working research overview; targeted source review on 7 September 2026. https://roat.sk/en/jurisdictions/slovakia/.

Add the access date. Web profiles may change; save the PDF as well to preserve the material used. When making a claim about the law, cite the legislation and provision identified in the answer.

The practical answers use the same evidence as the country comparison. Earlier research material with its own dates is retained below.

Earlier research material and ROAT records

Jurisdictions › Slovakia

ROAT-JUR-SK

Slovakia

Last verified 2026-09-05 (JA)Authorities Ministry of Transport of the Slovak Republic · Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic · Police Force

Slovakia combines a technically mature EU/UNECE type-approval baseline with a road-operation layer that still relies mainly on the § 49 test-operation permit under Act No. 106/2018 Coll. There is no general legal route from EU type approval to ordinary commercial driverless operation in force. Parliamentary print 1329 would introduce a licensed operator, an approved operation, a control centre and a supervision operator — a genuine second gate — but it is draft law and is coded only as a prospective regime.

Act 131/2026 Coll. effective 1 September 2026 (trial-focused amendment of § 49); parliamentary print 1329 passed first reading, committee stage September 2026.

In Module 01 · snapshot 2026-08-25 review snapshot

Regulatory normalisation by functional layer

RegimeTechnical approvalRoad access / operationActor allocationLiability / riskBehavioural rulesInfrastructureInternational / cross-borderRange · asynchronyConfiguration family
Current law · snapshot 2026-08-25
Slovakia§ 49 test-operation permit; narrower ADV operational regimeN3N1N1N1N1N1N22 · SignificantTesting-permit / technical-leading configuration

Slovakia Testing-permit / technical-leading configuration

Technical approval
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Road access / operation
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Actor allocation
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Liability / risk
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Behavioural rules
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Infrastructure
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
International / cross-border
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Primary current-law rationale
EU technical approval can reach N3, but current Slovak law still relies mainly on § 49 conditional test operation for AV/FAV; dedicated general operator/control-centre/fully automated deployment rules are proposed in print 1329 but are not yet law.
Dominant legal bridge / gate
§ 49 test-operation permit; narrower ADV operational regime
Sensitivity range
Road/actor/behaviour plausibly N1–N2 because of permits and the narrower automated-delivery-vehicle regime; technical stays N3.
Robust conclusion
Testing-permit / technical-leading configuration persists under plausible recoding and after the 1 September 2026 trial-focused amendment.
Important caveat
Snapshot is 25 August 2026. Print 1329 passed first reading but committee deadlines fall in September; Act 131/2026 is adopted but effective only from 1 September 2026.
Confidence
Medium–High
Sensitivity · prospective law (not current-law scores)
Slovakia from 1 Sept 2026 – Act 131/2026 onlyThe amendment broadens/adjusts § 49 trial mechanics but does not itself create a general deployment/operator regime.N3N1N1N1N1N1N2UNCHANGED PATHWAYThe amendment broadens/adjusts § 49 trial mechanics but does not itself create a general deployment/operator regime.

Slovakia from 1 Sept 2026 – Act 131/2026 only prospective

Technical approval
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Road access / operation
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Actor allocation
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Liability / risk
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Behavioural rules
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
Infrastructure
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
International / cross-border
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Primary current-law rationale
The amendment broadens/adjusts § 49 trial mechanics but does not itself create a general deployment/operator regime.
Interpretation
The amendment broadens/adjusts § 49 trial mechanics but does not itself create a general deployment/operator regime.
Core ROAT records
none
Slovakia if print 1329 enacted substantially as proposedWould move Slovakia from test-permit accommodation toward dedicated institutionalisation, while infrastructure and cross-border operational recognition would remain less mature.N3N3N3N2N3N1N2PATHWAY SHIFTWould move Slovakia from test-permit accommodation toward dedicated institutionalisation, while infrastructure and cross-border operational recognition would remain less mature.

Slovakia if print 1329 enacted substantially as proposed prospective

Technical approval
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Road access / operation
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Actor allocation
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Liability / risk
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Behavioural rules
N3 — Dedicated institutionalisation
Infrastructure
N1 — Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
International / cross-border
N2 — Bridge-based integration
Primary current-law rationale
Would move Slovakia from test-permit accommodation toward dedicated institutionalisation, while infrastructure and cross-border operational recognition would remain less mature.
Interpretation
Would move Slovakia from test-permit accommodation toward dedicated institutionalisation, while infrastructure and cross-border operational recognition would remain less mature.
Core ROAT records
none
N0Unintegrated / exceptional
N1Ad hoc or conditional accommodation
N2Bridge-based integration
N3Dedicated institutionalisation
N4Routinisation / mainstream recognition

In Module 02 · snapshot 2026-09-07 review snapshot

Post-type-approval deployment models

RegimeDeployment gateRemote human roleDominant deployment modelLegal statusConfidence
Current law · snapshot 2026-09-07
Slovakia – current law (31 Aug 2026)Predominantly § 49 test-operation permit; the only non-test deployment gate is the operational permit for automated delivery vehicles under § 52 of Act 106/2018; no general dedicated commercial FAV deployment gateNo general commercial FAV technical-supervision/control-centre role in force; supervising driver (dohliadajúci vodič) with remote takeover for automated delivery vehicles (Act 8/2009 § 2(2)(w), § 5(6))Testing-permit / technical-leading modelIn forceMedium–High

Slovakia – current law (31 Aug 2026)

Regulatory object
EU-approved vehicle + national test-operation / narrower operational exceptions
Technical approval baseline
EU/UNECE type-approval framework can provide high technical maturity
Additional deployment / road-use gate
Predominantly § 49 test-operation permit; the only non-test deployment gate is the operational permit for automated delivery vehicles under § 52 of Act 106/2018; no general dedicated commercial FAV deployment gate
ODD / operating-area legalisation
ODD reflected in permit/test conditions; for automated delivery vehicles the operational permit fixes territory, route and time (§ 52(6)); not yet a general autonomous-operation authorisation object
Competent authority / decision maker
Ministry of Transport / road and police authorities depending on permit
Primary accountable organisational actor
Permit holder / owner / driver-type roles; operator holding an operational permit for automated delivery vehicles (§ 52); no general licensed FAV operator architecture in force
Remote human role
No general commercial FAV technical-supervision/control-centre role in force; supervising driver (dohliadajúci vodič) with remote takeover for automated delivery vehicles (Act 8/2009 § 2(2)(w), § 5(6))
DDT / fallback allocation
Current framework remains structurally driver/test oriented; dedicated driverless DDT allocation is incomplete
Traffic-offence allocation
No complete general rule for traffic offences committed by driverless FAV
Civil liability / insurance
General motor insurance/civil liability; no mature FAV-specific allocation
Data / logging
Test-operation documentation and technical rules; supervision log and permit-conditioned operational data for automated delivery vehicles (Act 8/2009 § 6(7); Act 106/2018 § 52(6)–(7)); no general FAV logging architecture equivalent to CPT 1329
Post-market / in-use oversight
Primarily permit/test supervision rather than mature in-use driverless market oversight
Material change / software update
Handled through technical approval/test permit changes; no general deployment change-control regime
Retesting / revalidation
Retesting tied mainly to test-operation context
Commercial service pathway
No general pathway from EU type approval to ordinary commercial driverless operation; goods delivery by automated delivery vehicles is the only permitted service use (Act 8/2009 § 55b; Act 106/2018 § 52)
Dominant deployment model
Testing-permit / technical-leading model
Legal status
In force
Primary-source anchor
Act 106/2018 §§ 49, 52; Act 8/2009 §§ 2, 5, 6, 55b; Decree 131/2018; Act 131/2026 effective 1 Sep 2026 only prospectively at snapshot
Primary current-law rationale
The central inter-layer gap remains: technical admissibility does not yet map onto a general legal route for commercial driverless deployment.
Confidence
Medium–High
Sensitivity · prospective law (not current-law scores)
Slovakia – CPT 1329 prospective modelOperator licence + specific operation approval would create a genuine second gateSupervision operator + control centre; current draft boundary with remote driving needs correctionLicensed-operator + control-centre deployment modelDraft / parliamentary print 1329High for text; prospective only

Slovakia – CPT 1329 prospective model prospective

Regulatory object
Licensed FAV operator + approved operation + control centre + supervision operator + ODD
Technical approval baseline
EU/UNECE technical approval remains baseline
Additional deployment / road-use gate
Operator licence + specific operation approval would create a genuine second gate
ODD / operating-area legalisation
ODD and defined roads/territory become part of operational documentation / approval
Competent authority / decision maker
Ministry of Transport with police/other authority inputs
Primary accountable organisational actor
Licensed FAV operator becomes organisational centre of responsibility
Remote human role
Supervision operator + control centre; current draft boundary with remote driving needs correction
DDT / fallback allocation
ADS should remain DDT performer; current wording risks transferring DDT remotely to supervisor in some clauses
Traffic-offence allocation
Still requires explicit rule for offences committed by FAV while ADS is active
Civil liability / insurance
Insurance/organisational requirements improve, but full civil/product/service allocation remains to be clarified
Data / logging
Dedicated recording system proposed
Post-market / in-use oversight
Operator/licence supervision and operational duties create stronger in-use layer
Material change / software update
Draft requires clearer material-change / software-version triggers
Retesting / revalidation
Local validation/testing is structurally present but should be proportionate and recognise existing type-approval/foreign evidence
Commercial service pathway
Potential general commercial pathway if enacted and separated from test-only logic
Dominant deployment model
Licensed-operator + control-centre deployment model
Legal status
Draft / parliamentary print 1329
Primary-source anchor
CPT 1329 §§ 49a–49f and related amendments
Primary current-law rationale
The draft is conceptually close to a mature second-gate architecture, but actor boundaries, offence allocation, material-change control and the relation between licence and operation approval should be tightened.
Confidence
High for text; prospective only

Sources

Public Library records for Slovakia

Act No. 106/2018 Coll. on the Operation of Vehicles in Road Traffic (Zákon č. 106/2018 Z. z.)
Act No. 131/2026 Coll. amending the Slovak Road Traffic Act and related legislation (Zákon č. 131/2026 Z. z.)
Act No. 429/2022 Coll. amending laws in connection with the development of automated vehicles (Zákon č. 429/2022 Z. z.)
Act No. 8/2009 Coll. on Road Traffic (Zákon č. 8/2009 Z. z. o cestnej premávke)
Government Bill amending laws in connection with expanding the framework for introducing and using automated vehicles in the Slovak Republic (Parliamentary Print 1329)